Build and improve Flutter apps, resolve technical risks, and make AI-assisted development reliable.
Flutter development and AI workflow consulting
I help Flutter teams move important work forward without compromising architecture, tests, or maintainability.
Sometimes a Flutter product needs experienced implementation capacity. In other cases, a team needs help adopting AI coding tools or improving results that are inconsistent and hard to trust. I offer clearly structured engagements that leave your team with working code, stronger development practices, or both.
How I can help
Build
Build, complete, or improve a production Flutter application with experienced, hands-on development.
A good fit when you need senior capacity for a new app, an important product milestone, a difficult feature, or focused modernization.
Adopt and improve
Help your team adopt, standardize, or improve AI-assisted development without losing control of quality.
A good fit whether your team is getting started with coding agents or already using them with inconsistent results.
How the work is structured
Each engagement is shaped around your codebase and desired outcome. The scope may vary, but the working principles stay the same.
Is this a good fit?
The process
Tell me about your product, team, technical challenge, and the outcome you need.
We will identify whether hands-on Flutter delivery or AI-assisted development support is the best fit.
I will define the scope, deliverables, boundaries, delivery plan, and project price.
Your team receives working code, documented recommendations, an operational workflow, or an agreed combination of these.
Selected work
Owned production app
I built and launched Flutter Tips on iOS and Android, covering release configuration, analytics, monitoring, store delivery, and ongoing maintenance.
Interactive Flutter prototype
A working habit-tracker prototype with custom drawing, tap-and-hold gestures, animated themes, and an interactive 3D page transition.
AI-assisted technical artifact
I used AI-assisted development to replace a variable, token-heavy migration process with a deterministic Dart migration tool, explicit safety rules, and regression tests.
Independent manual review
I manually reviewed Cashew's architecture, dependencies, testing strategy, state management, and technical debt, then prioritized the most consequential risks.
Technical perspective
These comments are from developers who have used my Flutter courses and technical content. They are not consulting client testimonials.
Andrea's Flutter content is amazing. It's one of the few resources I consistently reference for advanced real-world solutions.
The way Andrea codes reveals a lot of best practices, good app architecture and interesting techniques; his source code is very clean and logical.
The emphasis on good architecture, state management, and best practices ensures you're building scalable and maintainable apps.
Flutter GDEGoogle Developer Expert
15+ yearsProfessional software experience
10+ yearsBuilding mobile apps for companies
FAQ
I can help build a new app, complete an important product phase, implement complex user flows, integrate Firebase or platform services, improve performance, and deliver focused migrations or modernization work. The engagement needs clear ownership, priorities, and a healthy working model rather than an undefined backlog.
Yes. Understanding the existing architecture, conventions, and constraints is part of the engagement. The goal is to deliver work that fits the codebase rather than introducing an unrelated preferred architecture.
The engagement is tailored to your team’s current stage. It can include reviewing existing practices, practical training, repository and agent configuration, architecture context, shared workflows, testing and verification safeguards, and guided use on real work in your codebase.
Not necessarily. A focused review is useful when the problems and priorities are unclear. If you already know what your team needs, we can scope training, workflow implementation, or guided improvement directly.
The principles apply across modern coding agents, including Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode. The exact setup will depend on the tools your team uses and the capabilities they provide.
Every engagement is scoped around the project, codebase, technical risk, and desired outcome. After an initial conversation, I will propose a clear scope, set of deliverables, delivery plan, and project price.
My default engagements have a defined scope and end point. Follow-up engagements or periodic reviews may be arranged where useful, but I do not normally join teams as indefinite staff augmentation.
We will agree on the access required before the engagement begins. I am happy to work under an appropriate NDA and follow your organization's security and confidentiality requirements.
For fixed-price projects, payments are per-milestone, payable upon delivery.
For hourly work, I will invoice once at the end of each week or once a minimum threshold is reached. I'll track and share my working hours with Toggl Track.
I'm based in Italy, and my usual working hours are between 8:30 and 16:00 UTC+2.
Yes, as I work remotely and asynchronously, you can reach out via chat during my working hours. I will also send you a daily status update so you're always informed of my progress.
Start a conversation
Tell me about the feature, technical risk, or AI workflow problem you are trying to solve. If it looks like a good fit, we will arrange a short conversation and I will prepare a tailored proposal.
